Nell Irvin Painter on Freedpeople’s Autonomy

The freedpeople insisted on being treated in a new way, no more as chattels but as people. They resolved, wrote an Army officer, “that in their present condition as freedmen their former masters and present employers should address them in a more respectful manner than formerly.”2 Now they refused the whippings that had been their lot as slaves. They “stoutly resisted” beatings, exhibiting an “independence and fearlessness” that showed them clearly cognizant of the difference between being slaves and being freedpeople, and willing to take care for themselves.3 They meant no harm toward their former masters, for the most part; rather they wanted simply to do for themselves and act in their own interests.

  • 2- Charles H. Gilchrist to W.G. Gordon, Jackson, Mississippi, September 17, 1865, United States Senate, 39th Congress, 1st session, Executive Document no. 2.
  • 3- Stephen Powers, Cincinnati Commercial correspondent, United States House of Representatives, 39th Congress, 1st session, Report no. 30. Report of the Joint Committee on Reconstruction (Washington, 1866), IV (Florida, Louisiana, Texas): 148

  • P. 5, Exodusters – Nell Irvin Painter, ISBN 0-393-00951-3

Nell Irvin Painter

Advertisements

Please leave your thoughts. Sometimes the only way one can find the truth is to examine all possibilities.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s